How Was the Sales Letter 2.0 Session?

Isn’t Michel Fortin amazing!? What did you think of his session?

Tags: ,

Leave A Reply (9 comments So Far)


  1. Stan Spiegel
    623 days ago

    Some very good parts; some undeveloped parts.

    Michel’s QUEST template was too abbreviated. He went through the QUEST in 15 seconds and didn’t develop it. In fact I only got to U before he was on to something else. I expected to have an outline of the necessary elements to include in a good sales letter: e.g., headline, lead, USP, etc.

    With his 5-P formula for good headlines, he gave no examples that epitomized his formula. It remained too abstract. Useful elements, of course, to include in each headline- but never concretized the way Bob Bly would have. As his hosts, it was your job to draw him out. You overlooked that.

    Excellent in his suggestion to ask client about his success stories and permission to call them up and ask questions about the product: A wonderful approach to market research. Good questions he came up with.


    • Chris Cobb
      623 days ago

      Thanks Stan for your constructive suggestions. We are very interested in learning not only how we can improve the sessions but also topics that folks would like more in depth discussions on.


  2. Mary E. Ulrich
    623 days ago

    Every time I hear Michel speak, he peels the onion down another layer. He makes Copywriting and Sales Letters doable. Love the mnemonics. What a great engaging speaker.


    • Karon Thackston
      622 days ago

      Michel is really an excellent trainer/teacher. And you’re right, Mary, he does offer a great deal of info.

      Stan, Chris is right. We are always open to ideas for improvement on how we can get the most out of a 1-hour session. Thanks for the suggestions.


  3. Gary Gray
    622 days ago

    I appreciated seeing the “successchef” as an example of web 2.0 flexability in the incorporation of a multi tab sales letter. Also liked the point that it is the message not the words that connects. The importance of doing the research to gain knowledge of FAQ’s and the knowedge required to show apathy to the reader. The powerful use of multimedia in the web 2.0 world. I agree with the “skim scan and scroll” method of information searching that Michael’s research revealed. Also appreciated the 5 P’s and the Q.U.E.S.T. template info. Thanks!

    This info should meke it easier to plan, develop and put into action sales pages in future.


    • Chris Cobb
      622 days ago

      I agree Gary. We’re all looking for those “magic” words, when in reality we need to concentrate on the message.


      • Karon Thackston
        622 days ago

        As Michel as proven quite well, sales letters ain’t what they used to be! He definitely shows how to bring your boring, long, scrolling sales letter of the past up to date so you can have more conversions. It’s nice to have a few of the long-standing myths busted, too.


  4. Della Hundley
    620 days ago

    I appreciate the common thread of writing to people as though you know them. More like you’re sharing a cup of coffee and conversation. This seems much more effective to me than the two other extremes: so much hype that it is impossible to believe the promised results or so formal and limited in scope that it feels like the old TV show Dragnet line of “just the facts ma’am.”


  5. Karon Thackston
    619 days ago

    I agree… I’m not into hype at all. I think that’s starting to really turn people away from what I’ve seen over the last few years. Michel’s a great one to learn from when it comes to the most up-to-date ways to create sales letters.

Member Login

Email:
Password:
Remember   

Forgot Password


Follow Christine

Christine Cobb on Twitter Christine Cobb on Facebook
Christine Cobb on You Tube Christine Cobb on LinkedIn

Follow Karon

Karon Thackston on Twitter Karon Thackston on Facebook
Karon Thackston on You Tube Karon Thackston on LinkedIn

Writing with the Science of Influence

Online Copywriting with Kevin Hogan